Allied Organizations:

The Koran in English

PowerPoint slide set 

Jihad/Terror Watch Dog Groups:

Welcome to the Sea Jay Foundation. Activism at the local level is a powerful way to protect our country from violent jihad. Shortly after the Patriot Act created the Department of Homeland Security, the new director Tom Ridge said  that everyone knows their own neighborhood; the normal rhythms of their life and work. When we see anything that isn't normal, we should alert our local law enforcement.  That advice is just as true today. "See something, Say something"

Understanding the interlocking relationship of the religion of Islam and the governmental system of Islam, expressed as Sharia Law, is fundamental to understanding the threat of violent jihad to our country.  The Sea Jay Foundation is our effort to spread that understanding in a spirit of love for every person.  We know that the vast majority of believers in Islam are not violent.  Many of those who do seek to do harm to our country and our people adhere to the most extreme interpretation of the teachings of Mohammed. It is critical that we always maintain that distinction, as it will guide our actions as a group. It is actions that can cause us harm, not thoughts. 


 The SEA JAY FOUNDATION will be represented at this Conference on Sept 14th and 15th. The Muslim Groups utilize these international forums to pass Resolutions against Blasphemy and Islamophobia. But when we present papers debunking both concepts, we can undo the consensus and prevent their passage.

To have these series of Resolutions passed lays the foundation for codifying them into International Law.


Clare Lopez & Elizabeth Sabbaditch Wolff

Dave Petteys Presents at OSCE

John Andrews at the OSCE

Dave Petteys at the OSCE

John Andrews at OSCE


David Petteys, representing the Sea Jay Foundation

Fundamental Freedoms I: (Continued) including:

-Freedom of peaceful assembly and association

Human Dimension Implementation Meeting

Warsaw, Poland, September 12, 2017 Working Session 2

Freedom of speech and of peaceful assembly is a fundamental right for citizens in the OSCE area. But this right is being seriously challenged in the United States.  The confrontation in Charlottesville Virginia was labeled by UN officials as an example of “rising racism and xenophobia in the United States” and urged the government to “punish the perpetrators of hate crimes”.

However, there are facts that are coming to light: the organizer of the event, a Mr. Jason Kessler, was recently involved in the “occupy Wall Street movement” funded by Mr. George Soros.  It’s suspicious that an individual would change his political views from Radical Left to white supremacist in less than a year.   Mr. Soros does have a record of funding these kinds of events, having funded Black Lives Matter , the demonstrations in Ferguson MO , the coup and bloodshed in the Ukraine and funding many other groups.

In Charlottesville, witnesses saw Antifa demonstrators dressed in black, Black Lives Matter members, and individuals dressed in KKK T shirts, all getting off the same 6 busses   before the confrontation.  Does this not smell like a false flag operation? Does this not have Mr. Soros’ fingerprints all over it?

So rather than Charlottesville being an example of “rising racism and xenophobia in the United States” what we really have is a Soros False Flag operation using a handful of miserable marginalized “Nazis and White Supremacists” (most in the pay of Mr. Soros?) blown out of proportion by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

The hypocrisy of UN and EU Officials jumps out when one compares the sanctimonious and selective outrage over Charlottesville with the deafening silence towards Muslim racism and xenophobia against the Jews.

While the President condemned the violence by all sides, the Left-Wing media gave the Left-wing groups a free pass and insisted that the President condemn only the “white nationalist racist” groups!    Soon thereafter, the “Freedom Rally” in San Francisco was cancelled due to “safety concerns” . The pattern is clear: if you don’t agree with the Left, you are a Nazi and you will be shut down with violence or the threat of violence!  This is a serious abridgement of Constitutional rights!

It also means that Law Enforcement and City Officials are violating their Oath of Office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. They are allowing the threat of violence to override the Constitutional rights of the demonstrators to free speech and freedom of assembly for the sake of keeping the peace. It means the threat of violence is being allowed to void the Constitution!

One Antifa poster is telling:

Image result for antifa posters

This poster demonizes and dehumanizes all 63 million Americans that voted for President Trump as Nazis! This poster is counter-factual!  Many of the Americans who voted for the President are elderly veterans of the very war that brought down National Socialist Germany nearly two generations ago.  To label such people “Nazis” is preposterous! Certainly, the fabric of our civil society cannot long survive such outrages!  It also violates the OSCE participating States’ commitment whereby “everyone will have the right of peaceful assembly and demonstration”.

The Sea Jay Foundation recommends that the OSCE participating States investigate and determine who is responsible for organizing and funding this violence that is taking place across the land and put a stop to it.

 The Sea Jay Foundation also recommends that participating States grow some backbone in defending those who wish to exercise their Constitutional rights, but are being threatened and intimidated into silence!

 The Sea Jay Foundation calls for the restoration of the right to freedom of speech and assembly to which citizens of the OSCE area are absolutely entitled by defending the exercise of such rights from violent groups.

HUMAN DIMENSION IMPLEMENTATION MEETING, 11-22 September 2017, Annotated Agenda page 4.


David Petteys, representing the Sea Jay Foundation

Fundamental Freedoms II: Freedom of Thought, Conscience, Religion or Belief

Human Dimension Implementation Meeting

Warsaw, Poland, September 14,2017 Working Session 6


Article 18 of the UN Universal declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) States:

“Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”

Article 9 of the Council of Europe’s European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) states:

  • Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion: this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
  • Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.


The United States Constitution’s First Amendment reads in part:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof:”

The significance of this is, that for the first time in 1400 years, the notion that a religious solidarity was necessary tor a coherent and stable society was overturned   It established the West’s cherished tradition of the “Separation of Church and State”.

Although battles of what constitutes the “Separation of Church and State” still rage in Court Rooms all across the United States, no particular denomination feeds at the public purse. Nor is membership in any denomination required for public office.

 It’s also important to note that the First Amendment does not call for the elimination of religious expression in Society, only that the Government not “establish” a State religion or denomination.

But let us now look at Articles 9 and 10 of the “Cairo Declaration of Human rights in Islam”:


(a) The seeking of knowledge is an obligation and provision of education is the duty of the society and the State. The State shall ensure the availability of ways and means to acquire education and shall guarantee its diversity in the interest of the society so as to enable man to be acquainted with the religion of Islam and uncover the secrets of the Universe for the benefit of mankind.

(b) Every human being has a right to receive both religious and worldly education from the various institutions of teaching, education and guidance, including the family, the school, the university, the media, etc., and in such an integrated and balanced manner that would develop human personality, strengthen man's faith in Allah and promote man's respect to and defence of both rights and obligations.



Islam is the religion of true unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of pressure on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to force him to change his religion to another religion or to atheism. “

It is obvious that the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam is incompatible with both the UDHR, the ECHR and the US Constitution, despite assertions to the contrary by various Islamic apologists.  The Sea Jay Foundation encourages the OSCE Institutions to consider the following from the Cairo Declaration:

  • ARTICLE 9 says it’s the duty of the State to teach Islam to “uncover the secrets of the universe”. But this clearly violates the Separation of Church and State! The goal to “strengthen man’s faith in Allah” is also a clear violation of the UDHR in that it is an enforcement of belief as well as another violation of the Separation between Church and State, reversing centuries of progress.
  • ARTICLE 10 clearly violates the “freedom to change religion” provisions as it prohibits any change from Islam.

But more fundamentally, all human rights under the Cairo Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari’ah law as it states in ARTICLE 24 .  But one needs to be reminded that the Shari’ah is completely incompatible with the ECHR, the UDHR and the US Constitution!!

The Sea Jay Foundation recommends that OSCE participating States recognize the existential threat that Islamic Shari’ah Law represents to citizens of the West and its utter incompatibility with our values.

“Religious Leadership, A Reference Handbook”, Sara Callahan, Editor, Seattle University, Sage Publications, Los Angeles 2013 Page 741, bottom of Left Hand column paragraph  paragraphs 61 and 62


David Petteys, representing the Sea Jay Foundation

Fundamental Freedoms II: Tolerance and non-Discrimination I

Human Dimension Implementation Meeting

Warsaw, Poland, September 14,2017 Working Session 7


I would like to address the notion of “tolerance”.   Tolerance is defined in the Cambridge Dictionary as

“willingness to accept behavior and beliefs that are different from your own, although you might not agree with or approve of them.

Muslim groups demand “tolerance” from the West of what they term “Islamic peculiarities”, such as wife beating, honor killing, beheadings, and the killing of apostates to name a few. These are merely “cultural differences” and must not be judged say the apologists!

And nations in the West are buying it!  In Australia, a young Muslim sex offender who groped women on a public beach was given a “free pass” owing to “cultural differences”!

The same thing happened with another Muslim who was caught trying to abduct a 4 year old girl , yet was released owing to “cultural differences”.

Another rapist from Tunisia claimed the same defense . However, in his case the Judge didn’t buy it and the rapists received the stiff jail sentence he deserved!

The root question here is whether or not the West will “tolerate” the flood of Muslim settlers into the West who are building a parallel society and who feel Western laws do not apply to them.  They obey only the Shari’ah and are slowly imposing it on us!  Government leaders need to understand that this is the basic definition of an “insurgency”!

In an insurgency, the invaders flood in, settle in enclaves, do not assimilate, infiltrate institutions and local governments, and build the parallel society that ultimately overthrows and replaces the host.

The Sea Jay Foundation recommends that governments in the West look beyond the ephemeral smoke screen claims of “refugee status”, “racism”, and “victimhood” and concentrate on the big picture: INSURGENCY!  The Muslim strategy to Islamize the West is well documented. One is entitled “The Project” written in 1982. Another is “The Explanatory Memorandum” , written in 1991 and captured in 2004. This isn’t “conspiracy”: it’s all laid out in black and white!

To divert attention from these facts, the Muslims and their apologists accuse those of us who bring these facts to the public’s attention as “Islamophobes, haters, and bigots”.  But these are actual plans written in actual documents.  These are not “unfounded phobias”. The only hate is in the Islamic content, and in nothing we say.  It is not “bigotry and hate” to merely bring facts to light!

In conclusion, The Sea Jay Foundation recognizes a limit to “tolerance” if western civilization is to survive. The Sea Jay Foundation believes the West has a right to be intolerant of those who intend to destroy us.


David Petteys, representing the Sea Jay Foundation

Fundamental Freedoms II: Tolerance and non-Discrimination I

Human Dimension Implementation Meeting

Warsaw, Poland, September 15, 2017 Working Session 8


Non-discrimination is sold as a fundamental virtue. But is it not a relative one? Does it not depend on of what we are being discriminatory about? All men need to be able to discriminate between good and evil.

ARTICLE 1 of the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam states that “All men are equal in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities without any discrimination on the basis of race, colour, language belief, sex, religion, political affiliation, social status or other considerations.”

Muslims in the West complain constantly and bitterly about “discrimination”. The CAIR website even has a Form you can fill out to “report a hate crime” of discrimination  Even the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has their “Islamophobia Observatory” to tally up the “discrimination hate crimes” against Muslims to solidify their “victim” status.   Yet many turn out to be false having been committed by Muslims themselves to further their own political agenda.

Part B of ARTICLE 1 of the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam goes on to say “ one has superiority over another except on the basis of piety and good deeds.”  Is this not a loophole through which one could drive a large truck?  Does this not mean that non-believers are inferior to Muslims? Does this not give Muslims permission to discriminate against non-believers?

Image result for muslims only to Makkah

Here is a perfect example of highway signage in Saudi Arabia that discriminates against non-Muslims from even entering the City of Makkah!  By contrast, Muslims are not prohibited from entering the Vatican, the seat of the Catholic Church.

ARTICLE 2 (d) states “Safety from bodily harm is a guaranteed right. It is the duty of the state to safeguard it and it is prohibited to breach it without a Shari’ah-prescribed reason.” But let us look at the following passages from the Qur’an:

“Therefore when ye meet the unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks: …”

Q 8:60

“Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know.”


“But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war);..”

And we see in the news daily stories about Muslim Jihad attacks in the West, over 31,000 at last count, This does not include repeated calls by Muslim leaders for the destruction of the West and its institutions.

The Sea Jay Foundation recommends that the OSCE participating states recognize the apparent hypocrisy on the part of Muslim groups, and take a closer look at these claims of “Discrimination”.

The Sea Jay Foundation also recommends that the OSCE participating states take seriously this existential threat Western Democracies presented by these continual calls for our destruction and continual Jihad attacks and the blatant discrimination against non-Muslims.



David Petteys, representing the Sea Jay Foundation

Fundamental Freedoms II: Tolerance and non-Discrimination I

Human Dimension Implementation Meeting

Warsaw, Poland, September 15, 2017 Working Session 9


Daily an Imam somewhere calls for the destruction of Jews,  Christianity, America and the West in general. They will quote passages from the Quran, such as “fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them” (meaning us!).    But since this is a quote from their Holy book, the West is supposed to be “tolerant” of such speech.

Yet if someone comments upon this, or quotes the Imam’s statements, it suddenly becomes “Intolerable Hate speech, bigotry, intolerance, inciting violence and hatred against Muslims”, and must be suppressed!  In a recent case, a Mr. Sturzenburger was convicted in Germany of “inciting hatred of Islam” for publishing a picture of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem with Adolph Hitler during WW II!


 But this is historical fact!  Clearly this is a violation of Mr. Sturzenberger’s rights and is inappropriate in the OSCE area!

But I believe there is an explanation for these events.  There is a false narrative about Islam that has been pushed in the West by the Muslim Brotherhood over the last two generations. It is that there are “moderate Muslims” and “extremist Muslims” and that these two groups are competing for the “Soul of Islam”.  Therefore, if we link violence with Islam, we are “validating” the extremist view of Islam and somehow “the extremists win”!  So the only way to stop the extremists is to NOT give them “validation” and to suppress people like Mr. Sturzenburger who tell the truth about Islam.  But the West has floundered for the last 16 years with this failed strategy !

The reason?  The whole premise is flawed.  There is no “war for the soul of Islam”: such ideological contests were settled centuries ago. The violence by Muslims in the West that we can see with our own eyes on a daily basis is absolutely theologically and qur’anically based.  Besides, the Jihad groups do not care a whit whether we “validate” them or not!  This is a grand deception to confuse and blunt our response to the very real existential Islamic threat to Western Civilization!

But lately, even this mild deception has been dispensed with. Muslims have their “Days of Rage” to enforce their Shari’ah upon Western societies. Remember the Danish Cartoons a few years back.

Millions of Islamic settlers are flooding into Europe and North America. They themselves call this “Hijra for Allah” with a Qur’anic mandate to overwhelm and Islamize us.  Yet we are told these people are legitimate immigrants.  Any citizen of the West that expresses concern or says otherwise is jailed for “intolerance”!

Then there are the formal Jihad attacks: trucks and knives, explosives, firearms, death and destruction. The governmental response? “Islam had nothing to do with it! We mustn’t show intolerance! We mustn’t even talk about it!”

The alarming and accelerating volume of crimes committed by these settlers is ignored by the mainstream press, lest they be guilty of disparaging Muslims and “inciting hatred and intolerance”.

Rather than fulfilling the basic fundamental duty of any government to protect its citizens from the depredations of these invaders, police officials spend their energies tracking down and arresting citizens that post on Face Book for “intolerance”

During the 9-ll hijackings of 2001, Muhammad Atta told the passengers of American Airlines 11 to “just stay quiet and you’ll be OK….” Is this not what the Western governments are doing now?  Just staying quiet, being tolerant, ignoring the evidence, and just hoping that “things will be OK”?

It doesn’t take much to realize that the rising flood of Islamic settlers, the increasing violent Jihad, the increasing crime rates as well as the astronomical welfare burdens are on the fast track to destabilize and ultimately destroy the West.  What other outcome can there possibly be?   It wasn’t “OK” for the passengers of American Airlines 11 on September 11, 2001, and it won’t be OK for the citizens of the West if things continue as they are.

The Sea Jay Foundation recommends that the governments in the OSCE area think carefully whether or not they wish to survive. The must decide if this warped view of “tolerance and non-discrimination” warrants civilizational suicide!


Michael Ellison. “’We have planes. Stay Quiet’ – Then Silence” Guardian, Oct 17, 2001




"G416 Patriiots" of San Antonio Texas is now heading up the fast becoming national project of textbook review. It's leader and founder LtCol Roy White is recruiting concerned citizens from all over the country to review the textbooks that are forming the world view and opinions of our children.
The reviewers strive to find patterns of errors, omissions and bias in the textbooks reviewed. Our children deserve better. Our children deserve facts and accuracy, not historical revisionism.

Executive Summary                 Report by textbook publisher


Here is a video of a witness who saw BOTH KKK and Antifa dressed individuals getting off busses prior to the confrontation. it is an indication that the whole confrontation was a "False Flag" setup.

For a great evaluation of events in the Middle East, we recommend you read this article from Family Security Matters.

We are also delighted to report that ACT for America now has a television show. It is called "The ACT for America Show". Look for it on your station listings. Learn more about it here. You can watch archived episodes online here.

SHARIAH: The Threat to America

Entitled "SHARIAH: The threat to America" This is a "second opinion" on the threat presented by violent Islam. This group of security experts was assembled to look at the available data and challenge current assumptions about the future of radical Islam and our country. Under the sponsorship of the Center for Security Policy, this group modeled its efforts on the "Team B" study of the Soviet Union threat to the US during the cold war.

The team includes R. James Woolsey, former Director of Central Intelligence; Lieutenant General William G. Boykin, former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence;  Lieutenant General Edward Soyster, former Director for Defense Intelligence Agency; Andrew C. McCarthy, former Assistant United States Attorney and Prosecutor of the Blind Sheikh; Joseph E. Schmitz, former Inspector General of the Department of Defense.

Read more about the report in the Washington Post. Download the 177 page report as an Adobe Acrobat file here.

Please visit the joint venture site Veteran Defenders of America and see what our retired military is doing to continue to serve and to protect our country.

As Jihad increases, so do the "honor killings"

"Finally, worldwide, 58 percent of the victims were murdered for being "too Western" and/or for resisting or disobeying cultural and religious expectations..."

Calendar of events .



Sharia: The Threat
2nd Opinion on
threat of Sharia

Product Details

Reliance of the Traveller

Now They Call Me